HackerPapers

arXiv:2101.10699cs.CR

Measuring Decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethereum using Multiple Metrics and Granularities

Qinwei Lin, Chao Li, Xifeng Zhao, Xianhai Chen

Abstract

Decentralization has been widely acknowledged as a core virtue of blockchains. However, in the past, there have been few measurement studies on measuring and comparing the actual level of decentralization between existing blockchains using multiple metrics and granularities. This paper presents a new comparison study of the degree of decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethereum, the two most prominent blockchains, with various decentralization metrics and different granularities within the time dimension. Specifically, we measure the degree of decentralization in the two blockchains during 2019 by computing the distribution of mining power with three metrics (Gini coefficient, Shannon entropy, and Nakamoto coefficient) as well as three granularities (days, weeks, and months). Our measurement results with different metrics and granularities reveal the same trend that, compared with each other, the degree of decentralization in Bitcoin is higher, while the degree of decentralization in Ethereum is more stable. To obtain the cross-interval information missed in the fixed window based measurements, we propose the sliding window based measurement approach. The corresponding results demonstrate that the use of sliding windows could reveal additional cross-interval information overlooked by the fixed window based measurements, thus enhancing the effectiveness of measuring decentralization in terms of continuous trends and abnormal situations. We believe that the methodologies and findings in this paper can facilitate future studies of decentralization in blockchains.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security cs.DBDatabases

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Feb 2021 to Oct 2021.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Both those articles on DPoS are referring to master node type coins. Nano's model is different in a couple fundamental ways: > Block producers are those responsible for creating and signing new blocks. They are limited in number, and are elected by the voters. Nano uses block…

      zepolenView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.