https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.10699/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28844807urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.10699:28844807Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:42:06 GMT<p>https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.10699.pdf</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.10699/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CRhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26209873urn:hackerpapers:mention:2101.10699:26209873Sun, 21 Feb 2021 01:14:51 GMT<p>Both those articles on DPoS are referring to master node type coins. Nano&#x27;s model is different in a couple fundamental ways: &gt; Block producers are those responsible for creating and signing new blocks. They are limited in number, and are elected by the voters. Nano uses block lattice so there aren&#x27;t a limited amount of block producers, every account produces its own blocks on it&#x27;s own blockchain. &gt; Because the delegate rewards in EOS are now so high (5% annual inflation, about $400m per year), Nano has zero rewards to run representative nodes, this is important to avoid emergent…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2101.10699/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CR