HackerPapers

arXiv:2010.03240cs.IR

Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions

Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, Xiangnan He

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

While recent years have witnessed a rapid growth of research papers on recommender system (RS), most of the papers focus on inventing machine learning models to better fit user behavior data. However, user behavior data is observational rather than experimental. This makes various biases widely exist in the data, including but not limited to selection bias, position bias, exposure bias, and popularity bias. Blindly fitting the data without considering the inherent biases will result in many serious issues, e.g., the discrepancy between offline evaluation and online metrics, hurting user satisfaction and trust on the recommendation service, etc. To transform the large volume of research models into practical improvements, it is highly urgent to explore the impacts of the biases and perform debiasing when necessary. When reviewing the papers that consider biases in RS, we find that, to our surprise, the studies are rather fragmented and lack a systematic organization. The terminology ``bias'' is widely used in the literature, but its definition is usually vague and even inconsistent across papers. This motivates us to provide a systematic survey of existing work on RS biases. In this paper, we first summarize seven types of biases in recommendation, along with their definitions and characteristics. We then provide a taxonomy to position and organize the existing work on recommendation debiasing. Finally, we identify some open challenges and envision some future directions, with the hope of inspiring more research work on this important yet less investigated topic. The summary of debiasing methods reviewed in this survey can be found at \url{https://github.com/jiawei-chen/RecDebiasing}.

arXiv comments
A new version of the bias survey, with supplementing causal explanations of biases and the latest debiasing technologies
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.IRInformation Retrieval

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jun 2021 to Jun 2021.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Thank you for sharing your approach, I find it very interesting. I've worked in some systems that also optimize for "serendipity"[1], which is just optimizing not only for ranking accuracy but also for adding new relevant content into the mix. (I believe you need a lot of data…

      theggintheskyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.