<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03240/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03240/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions — mentioned by thegginthesky</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27666350</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2010.03240:27666350</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:11:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for sharing your approach, I find it very interesting. I&amp;#x27;ve worked in some systems that also optimize for &amp;quot;serendipity&amp;quot;[1], which is just optimizing not only for ranking accuracy but also for adding new relevant content into the mix. (I believe you need a lot of data for this to be viable though) &amp;gt; I think the concerns about ML causing echo chambers/other problems, while not completely unfounded, are overblown I disagree that it&amp;#x27;s overblown. This is a widely discussed topic in ML research, especially around recommender systems [0]. While I do agree that ML systems have enormous…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2010.03240/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.IR</category></item></channel></rss>
