HackerPapers

arXiv:2009.05045quant-ph

Forecasting timelines of quantum computing

Jaime Sevilla, C. Jess Riedel

Abstract

We consider how to forecast progress in the domain of quantum computing. For this purpose we collect a dataset of quantum computer systems to date, scored on their physical qubits and gate error rate, and we define an index combining both metrics, the generalized logical qubit. We study the relationship between physical qubits and gate error rate, and tentatively conclude that they are positively correlated (albeit with some room for doubt), indicating a frontier of development that trades-off between them. We also apply a log-linear regression on the metrics to provide a tentative upper bound on how much progress can be expected over time. Within the (generally optimistic) assumptions of our model, including the key assumption that exponential progress in qubit count and gate fidelity will continue, we estimate that that proof-of-concept fault-tolerant computation based on superconductor technology is unlikely (<5% confidence) to be exhibited before 2026, and that quantum devices capable of factoring RSA-2048 are unlikely (<5% confidence) to exist before 2039. It is of course possible that these milestones will in fact be reached earlier, but that this would require faster progress than has yet been seen.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics cs.ETEmerging Technologies

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 4 threads, from Jul 2022 to Dec 2024. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2020 to Sep 2020. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

  1. Willow, Our Quantum Chip 1 comment
    • Thank you for the explanation. It's still an upwards update on the qubit timelines of https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.05045 (see Fig. 7), but not by an insane amount. We've realized their 95% expectation of qubit progress (1 logical qubit) for 2026, in 2024.92 instead. Which to be…

      rhaps0dyView on HNParent context

    • > I thought the error rate has stayed pretty exponential in terms of the number of physical qubits needed to express a logical qubit There is finite a threshold error rate (roughly 0.1-1%) at which you can produce a single logical qubit with an unbounded number of physical…

      jessriedelView on HNParent context

  2. 2048 Bit RSA and the Year 2030 1 comment
    • At least as of 2020, it looked like both qubit counts and two-qubit gate quality were improving exponentially, and our naive extrapolation said RSA 2048 wouldn't get cracked by 2039 at 95% confidence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.05045 As far as I can tell, this website suggests…

      jessriedelView on HNParent context

    • It's hard to say. Here is a great paper that tries to answer this question. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.05045v1.pdf See Figure 11. Optimistically 15 years. Pessimistically 35 years. But anything can happen.

      bwesterbView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.