arXiv:2003.04498cs.CR
Are We Susceptible to Rowhammer? An End-to-End Methodology for Cloud Providers
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Cloud providers are concerned that Rowhammer poses a potentially critical threat to their servers, yet today they lack a systematic way to test whether the DRAM used in their servers is vulnerable to Rowhammer attacks. This paper presents an end-to-end methodology to determine if cloud servers are susceptible to these attacks. With our methodology, a cloud provider can construct worst-case testing conditions for DRAM. We apply our methodology to three classes of servers from a major cloud provider. Our findings show that none of the CPU instruction sequences used in prior work to mount Rowhammer attacks create worst-case DRAM testing conditions. To address this limitation, we develop an instruction sequence that leverages microarchitectural side-effects to ``hammer'' DRAM at a near-optimal rate on modern Intel Skylake and Cascade Lake platforms. We also design a DDR4 fault injector that can reverse engineer row adjacency for any DDR4 DIMM. When applied to our cloud provider's DIMMs, we find that DRAM rows do not always follow a linear map.
Microsoft Research looked into it - Paper is from 2020 and is reference 24 in the document mentioned in the main post here. "Are We Susceptible to Rowhammer? An End-to-End Methodology for Cloud Providers" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.04498.pdf Although their answer in this paper…
belterView on HNParent context