<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are We Susceptible to Rowhammer? An End-to-End Methodology for Cloud Providers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.04498/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.04498/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are We Susceptible to Rowhammer? An End-to-End Methodology for Cloud Providers — mentioned by belter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29230029</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.04498:29230029</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:37:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft Research looked into it - Paper is from 2020 and is reference 24 in the document mentioned in the main post here. &amp;quot;Are We Susceptible to Rowhammer? An End-to-End Methodology for Cloud Providers&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.04498.pdf Although their answer in this paper was diplomatic, my interpretation is that they confirm it as a problem. Their conclusion was it would not be as bad it was considered at the time. To be revisited on the context of this more recent work. Edit: Adding main reference &amp;quot;BLACKSMITH: Scalable Rowhammering in the Frequency Domain&amp;quot;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.04498/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
