HackerPapers

arXiv:1911.01968cs.CY

Thermodynamic Computing

Tom Conte, Erik DeBenedictis, Natesh Ganesh, Todd Hylton, John Paul Strachan, R. Stanley Williams, Alexander Alemi, Lee Altenberg, Gavin Crooks, James Crutchfield, Lidia del Rio, Josh Deutsch, Michael DeWeese, Khari Douglas, Massimiliano Esposito, Michael Frank, Robert Fry, Peter Harsha, Mark Hill, Christopher Kello, Jeff Krichmar, Suhas Kumar, Shih-Chii Liu, Seth Lloyd, Matteo Marsili, Ilya Nemenman, Alex Nugent, Norman Packard, Dana Randall, Peter Sadowski, Narayana Santhanam, Robert Shaw, Adam Stieg, Elan Stopnitzky, Christof Teuscher, Chris Watkins, David Wolpert, Joshua Yang, Yan Yufik

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The hardware and software foundations laid in the first half of the 20th Century enabled the computing technologies that have transformed the world, but these foundations are now under siege. The current computing paradigm, which is the foundation of much of the current standards of living that we now enjoy, faces fundamental limitations that are evident from several perspectives. In terms of hardware, devices have become so small that we are struggling to eliminate the effects of thermodynamic fluctuations, which are unavoidable at the nanometer scale. In terms of software, our ability to imagine and program effective computational abstractions and implementations are clearly challenged in complex domains. In terms of systems, currently five percent of the power generated in the US is used to run computing systems - this astonishing figure is neither ecologically sustainable nor economically scalable. Economically, the cost of building next-generation semiconductor fabrication plants has soared past $10 billion. All of these difficulties - device scaling, software complexity, adaptability, energy consumption, and fabrication economics - indicate that the current computing paradigm has matured and that continued improvements along this path will be limited. If technological progress is to continue and corresponding social and economic benefits are to continue to accrue, computing must become much more capable, energy efficient, and affordable. We propose that progress in computing can continue under a united, physically grounded, computational paradigm centered on thermodynamics. Herein we propose a research agenda to extend these thermodynamic foundations into complex, non-equilibrium, self-organizing systems and apply them holistically to future computing systems that will harness nature's innate computational capacity. We call this type of computing "Thermodynamic Computing" or TC.

arXiv comments
A Computing Community Consortium (CCC) workshop report, 36 pages
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society cs.ETEmerging Technologies

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jan 2021 to Feb 2021.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • This is a great step and all, but shouldn't we be being a little more adventurous? A unified understanding of computation and thermodynamics has the potential to enable systems that are vastly more capable. We are piddling around in the shallow end making incremental…

      plutonormView on HNParent context

    • > For AGI, do you really think there are detailed proposals out there today that can achieve AGI but are only missing the computational power? Yes, I really do. It's neural networks, nothing more. All that is required is more power. Despite its lower power the brain is much more…

      plutonormView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.