HackerPapers

arXiv:1909.04380cond-mat.stat-mech

Complete Set of Stochastic Verlet-Type Thermostats for Correct Langevin Simulations

Niels Grønbech-Jensen

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We present the complete set of stochastic Verlet-type algorithms that can provide correct statistical measures for both configurational and kinetic sampling in discrete-time Langevin systems. The approach is a brute-force general representation of the Verlet-algorithm with free parameter coefficients that are determined by requiring correct Boltzmann sampling for linear systems, regardless of time step. The result is a set of statistically correct methods given by one free functional parameter, which can be interpreted as the one-time-step velocity attenuation factor. We define the statistical characteristics of both true on-site $v^n$ and true half-step $u^{n+\frac{1}{2}}$ velocities, and use these definitions for each statistically correct Stormer-Verlet method to find a unique associated half-step velocity expression, which yields correct kinetic Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics for linear systems. It is shown that no other similar, statistically correct on-site velocity exists. We further discuss the use and features of finite-difference velocity definitions that are neither true on-site, nor true half-step. The set of methods is written in convenient and conventional stochastic Verlet forms that lend themselves to direct implementation for, e.g., Molecular Dynamics applications. We highlight a few specific examples, and validate the algorithms through comprehensive Langevin simulations of both simple nonlinear oscillators and complex Molecular Dynamics.

arXiv comments
To Appear in Molecular Physics
Journal reference
Molecular Physics Vol.118, e1662506 (2020)
DOI
doi:10.1080/00268976.2019.1662506
Subjects
cond-mat.stat-mechStatistical Mechanics physics.comp-phComputational Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2019 to Oct 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I only read the abstract from the most recent linked article [1], but it sounds like the results are statistically correct. For this field, that makes a lot of sense, rather than computing strictly “accurate” velocity/acceleration from finite differences (see [2] for the basics…

      boulosView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.