<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Complete Set of Stochastic Verlet-Type Thermostats for Correct Langevin Simulations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.04380/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.04380/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Complete Set of Stochastic Verlet-Type Thermostats for Correct Langevin Simulations — mentioned by boulos</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21301068</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1909.04380:21301068</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 22:10:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I only read the abstract from the most recent linked article [1], but it sounds like the results are statistically correct. For this field, that makes a lot of sense, rather than computing strictly “accurate” velocity/acceleration from finite differences (see [2] for the basics on this integration method / domain). Edit (to make my comment clearer): they came up with a method to calculate the velocities they need for solving these equations with a new closed-form solution that doesn’t depend on the timestep size. This lets the author combine the new calculation with previous work to take big…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.04380/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item></channel></rss>
