HackerPapers

arXiv:1909.01958cs.CL

From 'F' to 'A' on the N.Y. Regents Science Exams: An Overview of the Aristo Project

Peter Clark, Oren Etzioni, Daniel Khashabi, Tushar Khot, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Kyle Richardson, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, Oyvind Tafjord, Niket Tandon, Sumithra Bhakthavatsalam, Dirk Groeneveld, Michal Guerquin, Michael Schmitz

Abstract

AI has achieved remarkable mastery over games such as Chess, Go, and Poker, and even Jeopardy, but the rich variety of standardized exams has remained a landmark challenge. Even in 2016, the best AI system achieved merely 59.3% on an 8th Grade science exam challenge. This paper reports unprecedented success on the Grade 8 New York Regents Science Exam, where for the first time a system scores more than 90% on the exam's non-diagram, multiple choice (NDMC) questions. In addition, our Aristo system, building upon the success of recent language models, exceeded 83% on the corresponding Grade 12 Science Exam NDMC questions. The results, on unseen test questions, are robust across different test years and different variations of this kind of test. They demonstrate that modern NLP methods can result in mastery on this task. While not a full solution to general question-answering (the questions are multiple choice, and the domain is restricted to 8th Grade science), it represents a significant milestone for the field.

arXiv comments
AI Magazine 41 (4) Winter 2020. New analysis sections added
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Aug 2020 to Mar 2023. Found in 2 HN submissions from Sep 2019 to Sep 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • I don't understand what you want me to ask it about. So I asked it something, as usual every citation and URL is real despite not having internet access or training data after 2021: <PROMPT>List some citations of recent Machine Learning papers discussing reasoning ability in…

      MacsHeadroomView on HNParent context

    • I found the science exams results interesting and skimmed the paper [1]. They report an accuracy of >90% on the questions. What I found puzzling was that they have a section in the experimental results part where they test the robustness of the results using adverserial answer…

      FiberBundleView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.