HackerPapers

arXiv:1906.05317cs.CL

COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction

Antoine Bosselut, Hannah Rashkin, Maarten Sap, Chaitanya Malaviya, Asli Celikyilmaz, Yejin Choi

Abstract

We present the first comprehensive study on automatic knowledge base construction for two prevalent commonsense knowledge graphs: ATOMIC (Sap et al., 2019) and ConceptNet (Speer et al., 2017). Contrary to many conventional KBs that store knowledge with canonical templates, commonsense KBs only store loosely structured open-text descriptions of knowledge. We posit that an important step toward automatic commonsense completion is the development of generative models of commonsense knowledge, and propose COMmonsEnse Transformers (COMET) that learn to generate rich and diverse commonsense descriptions in natural language. Despite the challenges of commonsense modeling, our investigation reveals promising results when implicit knowledge from deep pre-trained language models is transferred to generate explicit knowledge in commonsense knowledge graphs. Empirical results demonstrate that COMET is able to generate novel knowledge that humans rate as high quality, with up to 77.5% (ATOMIC) and 91.7% (ConceptNet) precision at top 1, which approaches human performance for these resources. Our findings suggest that using generative commonsense models for automatic commonsense KB completion could soon be a plausible alternative to extractive methods.

arXiv comments
Accepted to ACL 2019
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 4 threads, from May 2020 to Mar 2023. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2019 to Jun 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

    • I don't understand what you want me to ask it about. So I asked it something, as usual every citation and URL is real despite not having internet access or training data after 2021: <PROMPT>List some citations of recent Machine Learning papers discussing reasoning ability in…

      MacsHeadroomView on HNParent context

    • Has there been any good work applying causal inference explicitly to common NLP tasks like question-answering? Or to game-play? The lack of common-sense in models like GPT-3 would seem to indicate a huge opportunity, perhaps in tandem with COMET[0] or some other graph-based…

      wfhpwView on HNParent context

    • You are kidding, right? All these questions you provided are extremely simple to answer, compared to many other things clever human interrogators might say during TT. I'm starting to doubt your NLP expertise. The TT ready model I'm envisioning will be trained on many billions of…

      p1eskView on HNParent context

  1. GPT-3: A Disappointing Paper? 1 comment
    • I think using AE for text generation is a good idea, and is pretty old one (I tried it myself back in 2015 without particularly good results), but I wouldn't call it a breakthrough. To me a breakthrough/new paradigm would be something like this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05317

      p1eskView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.