HackerPapers

arXiv:1812.07179cs.CV

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving

Yan Wang, Wei-Lun Chao, Divyansh Garg, Bharath Hariharan, Mark Campbell, Kilian Q. Weinberger

Abstract

3D object detection is an essential task in autonomous driving. Recent techniques excel with highly accurate detection rates, provided the 3D input data is obtained from precise but expensive LiDAR technology. Approaches based on cheaper monocular or stereo imagery data have, until now, resulted in drastically lower accuracies --- a gap that is commonly attributed to poor image-based depth estimation. However, in this paper we argue that it is not the quality of the data but its representation that accounts for the majority of the difference. Taking the inner workings of convolutional neural networks into consideration, we propose to convert image-based depth maps to pseudo-LiDAR representations --- essentially mimicking the LiDAR signal. With this representation we can apply different existing LiDAR-based detection algorithms. On the popular KITTI benchmark, our approach achieves impressive improvements over the existing state-of-the-art in image-based performance --- raising the detection accuracy of objects within the 30m range from the previous state-of-the-art of 22% to an unprecedented 74%. At the time of submission our algorithm holds the highest entry on the KITTI 3D object detection leaderboard for stereo-image-based approaches. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/mileyan/pseudo_lidar.

arXiv comments
Accepted by CVPR 2019
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Apr 2019 to May 2019. Found in 5 HN submissions from Dec 2018 to Apr 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • That quote I posted was the sentences just before the ones you selected. Why don't you read the paper a bit - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.07179.pdf And then work out why they used the words "birds eye" that you found so upsetting.

      WhatIsDukkhaView on HNParent context

    • Continuing to deny something that exists is actually beyond calling it impossible! If you've got some spare time, go read some third party research on how cameras might actually be better. Lidar superiority is a myth. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.07179.pdf

      pbreitView on HNParent context

    • Independent researchers have already proven Musk to be 100% right about LIDAR. Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07179 3D object detection is an essential task in autonomous…

      IsinlorView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.