Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving · HackerPapers discussions

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — mentioned by WhatIsDukkha

Wed, 01 May 2019 17:20:47 GMT

That quote I posted was the sentences just before the ones you selected. Why don't you read the paper a bit - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.07179.pdf And then work out why they used the words "birds eye" that you found so upsetting.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — HN submission

Sun, 28 Apr 2019 08:32:40 GMT

Pseudo-Lidar: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving

3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — HN submission

Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:00:59 GMT

Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — mentioned by pbreit

Thu, 25 Apr 2019 07:37:27 GMT

Continuing to deny something that exists is actually beyond calling it impossible! If you've got some spare time, go read some third party research on how cameras might actually be better. Lidar superiority is a myth. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.07179.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — HN submission

Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:51:08 GMT

Pseudo-Lidar Visual Depth Estimation: 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving

4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — HN submission

Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:39:04 GMT

Pseudo-Lidar from Visual Depth Estimation

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — mentioned by Isinlor

Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:38:54 GMT

Independent researchers have already proven Musk to be 100% right about LIDAR. Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07179 3D object detection is an essential task in autonomous driving. Recent techniques excel with highly accurate detection rates, provided the 3D input data is obtained from precise but expensive LiDAR technology. Approaches based on cheaper monocular or stereo imagery data have, until now, resulted in drastically lower accuracies --- a gap that is commonly attributed to poor…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving — HN submission

Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:28:27 GMT

Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.