HackerPapers

arXiv:1709.05111cs.SI

Activity Archetypes in Question-and-Answer (Q&A) Websites - A Study of 50 Stack Exchange Instances

Tiago Santos, Simon Walk, Roman Kern, Markus Strohmaier, Denis Helic

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Millions of users on the Internet discuss a variety of topics on Question-and-Answer (Q&A) instances. However, not all instances and topics receive the same amount of attention, as some thrive and achieve self-sustaining levels of activity, while others fail to attract users and either never grow beyond being a small niche community or become inactive. Hence, it is imperative to not only better understand but also to distill deciding factors and rules that define and govern sustainable Q&A instances. We aim to empower community managers with quantitative methods for them to better understand, control and foster their communities, and thus contribute to making the Web a more efficient place to exchange information. To that end, we extract, model and cluster user activity-based time series from $50$ randomly selected Q&A instances from the Stack Exchange network to characterize user behavior. We find four distinct types of user activity temporal patterns, which vary primarily according to the users' activity frequency. Finally, by breaking down total activity in our 50 Q&A instances by the previously identified user activity profiles, we classify those 50 Q&A instances into three different activity profiles. Our parsimonious categorization of Q&A instances aligns with the stage of development and maturity of the underlying communities, and can potentially help operators of such instances: We not only quantitatively assess progress of Q&A instances, but we also derive practical implications for optimizing Q&A community building efforts, as we e.g. recommend which user types to focus on at different developmental stages of a Q&A community.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
ACM Transactions on Social Computing, Volume 2 Issue 1, February 2019, Article No. 4
DOI
doi:10.1145/3301612
Subjects
cs.SISocial and Information Networks

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2022 to May 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • We didn't focus on individual contributions, only on community-level metrics. The reputation metric we used rewards frequency of contributions (questions, answer, comments) and that turned out to make a difference in building a strong core. Also, core is not static, sustainable…

      atomashevicView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.