<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Activity Archetypes in Question-and-Answer (Q&amp;A) Websites - A Study of 50 Stack Exchange Instances · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05111/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05111/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Activity Archetypes in Question-and-Answer (Q&amp;A) Websites - A Study of 50 Stack Exchange Instances — mentioned by atomashevic</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31456305</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1709.05111:31456305</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2022 08:44:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We didn&amp;#x27;t focus on individual contributions, only on community-level metrics. The reputation metric we used rewards frequency of contributions (questions, answer, comments) and that turned out to make a difference in building a strong core. Also, core is not static, sustainable communities have the ability to &amp;quot;pull&amp;quot; new users into the core, so new, enthusiastic users are not discarded by the existing core. If you are interested in individual efforts and user archetypes take a look at another work: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05111&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05111/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item></channel></rss>
