HackerPapers

arXiv:1707.04393cs.DL

Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative

Nicolas P. Rougier, Konrad Hinsen, Frédéric Alexandre, Thomas Arildsen, Lorena Barba, Fabien C. Y. Benureau, C. Titus Brown, Pierre de Buyl, Ozan Caglayan, Andrew P. Davison, Marc André Delsuc, Georgios Detorakis, Alexandra K. Diem, Damien Drix, Pierre Enel, Benoît Girard, Olivia Guest, Matt G. Hall, Rafael Neto Henriques, Xavier Hinaut, Kamil S Jaron, Mehdi Khamassi, Almar Klein, Tiina Manninen, Pietro Marchesi, Dan McGlinn, Christoph Metzner, Owen L. Petchey, Hans Ekkehard Plesser, Timothée Poisot, Karthik Ram, Yoav Ram, Etienne Roesch, Cyrille Rossant, Vahid Rostami, Aaron Shifman, Joseph Stachelek, Marcel Stimberg, Frank Stollmeier, Federico Vaggi, Guillaume Viejo, Julien Vitay, Anya Vostinar, Roman Yurchak, Tiziano Zito

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results, however computational science lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. James Buckheit and David Donoho proposed more than two decades ago that an article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code, and data that produced the result. This implies new workflows, in particular in peer-reviews. Existing journals have been slow to adapt: source codes are rarely requested, hardly ever actually executed to check that they produce the results advertised in the article. ReScience is a peer-reviewed journal that targets computational research and encourages the explicit replication of already published research, promoting new and open-source implementations in order to ensure that the original research can be replicated from its description. To achieve this goal, the whole publishing chain is radically different from other traditional scientific journals. ReScience resides on GitHub where each new implementation of a computational study is made available together with comments, explanations, and software tests.

arXiv comments
8 pages, 1 figure
Journal reference
PeerJ Computer Science 3:e142 (2017)
DOI
doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.142
Subjects
cs.DLDigital Libraries

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2022 to Jan 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • This is a common misconception, but you are actually talking about "replicability" which is "writing and then running new software based on the description of a computational model or method provided in the original publication, and obtaining results that are similar enough"…

      allenofthehillsView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.