<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.04393/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.04393/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative — mentioned by allenofthehills</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29936412</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1707.04393:29936412</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:22:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a common misconception, but you are actually talking about &amp;quot;replicability&amp;quot; which is &amp;quot;writing and then running new software based on the description of a computational model or method provided in the original publication, and obtaining results that are similar enough&amp;quot; [1]. Reproducibility instead refers to running the same code on the same data to get the same results [2]. [1] Rougier et al., &amp;quot;Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04393 [2] Plesser, &amp;quot;Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology&amp;quot;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.04393/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item></channel></rss>
