HackerPapers

arXiv:1601.05438astro-ph.EP

Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System

Konstantin Batygin, Michael E. Brown

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Recent analyses have shown that distant orbits within the scattered disk population of the Kuiper belt exhibit an unexpected clustering in their respective arguments of perihelion. While several hypotheses have been put forward to explain this alignment, to date, a theoretical model that can successfully account for the observations remains elusive. In this work we show that the orbits of distant Kuiper belt objects cluster not only in argument of perihelion, but also in physical space. We demonstrate that the perihelion positions and orbital planes of the objects are tightly confined and that such a clustering has only a probability of 0.007% to be due to chance, thus requiring a dynamical origin. We find that the observed orbital alignment can be maintained by a distant eccentric planet with mass greater than ~10 Earth masses, whose orbit lies in approximately the same plane as those of the distant Kuiper belt objects, but whose perihelion is 180 degrees away from the perihelia of the minor bodies. In addition to accounting for the observed orbital alignment, the existence of such a planet naturally explains the presence of high perihelion Sedna-like objects, as well as the known collection of high semimajor axis objects with inclinations between 60 and 150 degrees whose origin was previously unclear. Continued analysis of both distant and highly inclined outer solar system objects provides the opportunity for testing our hypothesis as well as further constraining the orbital elements and mass of the distant planet.

arXiv comments
13 pages, 9 figures, published in the Astronomical Journal, 151, 22
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22
Subjects
astro-ph.EPEarth and Planetary Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2018 to May 2018.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Not an astronomer, but let's try going by Wikipedia: Neptune has apparent magnitude of about 8. If you displaced it to twice as far, it'd become 16 times as dim (twice the distance, squared). The scale of apparent magnitude is a factor of 2.512 per step, so that'd be a change of…

      abecedariusView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.