<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.05438/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.05438/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System — mentioned by abecedarius</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17098213</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1601.05438:17098213</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 02:31:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not an astronomer, but let&amp;#x27;s try going by Wikipedia: Neptune has apparent magnitude of about 8. If you displaced it to twice as far, it&amp;#x27;d become 16 times as dim (twice the distance, squared). The scale of apparent magnitude is a factor of 2.512 per step, so that&amp;#x27;d be a change of about 3, to magnitude 11. The biggest ground-based telescopes can go up to around 24-26, if you dedicate significant observing time. So (26-8)/3=6 doublings: they could detect Neptune at 64 times as far out as it is, if they knew where to look. That&amp;#x27;s ~1900 AU. But of course Neptune is bigger and likely more…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1601.05438/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
