HackerPapers

arXiv:1509.06183quant-ph

Provable Quantum Advantage in Randomness Processing

Howard Dale, David Jennings, Terry Rudolph

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Quantum advantage is notoriously hard to find and even harder to prove. For example the class of functions computable with classical physics actually exactly coincides with the class computable quantum-mechanically. It is strongly believed, but not proven, that quantum computing provides exponential speed-up for a range of problems, such as factoring. Here we address a computational scenario of "randomness processing" in which quantum theory provably yields, not only resource reduction over classical stochastic physics, but a strictly larger class of problems which can be solved. Beyond new foundational insights into the nature and malleability of randomness, and the distinction between quantum and classical information, these results also offer the potential of developing classically intractable simulations with currently accessible quantum technologies.

arXiv comments
A much improved version of the paper is available in Nature Communications. (10.1038/ncomms9203)
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1038/ncomms9203
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2023 to Oct 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Given access to repeated uses of a coin of unknown bias "p" (which is not 0 or 1) you can (eventually) always generate a new coin flip with bias given (exactly) by: 1. 1/2 (i.e fair - von Neumann) 2. p^2 3. p^2/(p^2+(1-p)^2) 4. sqrt(p) Number 4 really surprised me, I learned it…

      Q_is_4_QuantumView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.