HackerPapers

arXiv:1506.03159stat.ML

Copula variational inference

Dustin Tran, David M. Blei, Edoardo M. Airoldi

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We develop a general variational inference method that preserves dependency among the latent variables. Our method uses copulas to augment the families of distributions used in mean-field and structured approximations. Copulas model the dependency that is not captured by the original variational distribution, and thus the augmented variational family guarantees better approximations to the posterior. With stochastic optimization, inference on the augmented distribution is scalable. Furthermore, our strategy is generic: it can be applied to any inference procedure that currently uses the mean-field or structured approach. Copula variational inference has many advantages: it reduces bias; it is less sensitive to local optima; it is less sensitive to hyperparameters; and it helps characterize and interpret the dependency among the latent variables.

arXiv comments
Appears in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics) cs.LGMachine Learning stat.COComputation (Statistics) stat.MEMethodology (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2015 to Sep 2015.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • that's a really good question. some aspects of VI vs MCMC are areas of active research. so it's tough to respond succinctly, but i'll try. the key disadvantages of VI (particularly ADVI) are: 1. mean-field variational inference cannot model posterior correlations. so if you…

      proditusView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.