arXiv:1502.07685stat.ML
Covariance Matrices and Influence Scores for Mean Field Variational Bayes
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Mean field variational Bayes (MFVB) is a popular posterior approximation method due to its fast runtime on large-scale data sets. However, it is well known that a major failing of MFVB is that it underestimates the uncertainty of model variables (sometimes severely) and provides no information about model variable covariance. We develop a fast, general methodology for exponential families that augments MFVB to deliver accurate uncertainty estimates for model variables -- both for individual variables and coherently across variables. MFVB for exponential families defines a fixed-point equation in the means of the approximating posterior, and our approach yields a covariance estimate by perturbing this fixed point. Inspired by linear response theory, we call our method linear response variational Bayes (LRVB). We also show how LRVB can be used to quickly calculate a measure of the influence of individual data points on parameter point estimates. We demonstrate the accuracy and scalability of our method by learning Gaussian mixture models for both simulated and real data.
that's a really good question. some aspects of VI vs MCMC are areas of active research. so it's tough to respond succinctly, but i'll try. the key disadvantages of VI (particularly ADVI) are: 1. mean-field variational inference cannot model posterior correlations. so if you…
proditusView on HNParent context