HackerPapers

arXiv:1405.0466physics.flu-dyn

Comment on Y. Couder and E. Fort: "Single-Particle Diffraction and Interference at a Macroscopic Scale", Phys. Rev. Lett. (2006)

Anders Andersen, Jacob Madsen, Christian Reichelt, Sonja Rosenlund Ahl, Benny Lautrup, Clive Ellegaard, Mogens T. Levinsen, Tomas Bohr

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In a paper from 2006, Couder and Fort [1] describe a version of the famous double slit experiment performed with drops bouncing on a vibrated fluid surface, where interference in the particle statistics is found even though it is possible to determine unambiguously which slit the "walking" drop passes. It is one of the first papers in an impressive series, showing that such walking drops closely resemble de Broglie waves and can reproduce typical quantum phenomena like tunneling and quantized states [2-13]. The double slit experiment is, however, a more stringent test of quantum mechanics, because it relies upon superposition and phase coherence. In the present comment we first point out that the experimental data presented in [1] are not convincing, and secondly we argue that it is not possible in general to capture quantum mechanical results in a system, where the trajectory of the particle is well-defined.

arXiv comments
4 pages, 1 figure
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
physics.flu-dynFluid Dynamics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jul 2014 to Jul 2014.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • An interesting response to the fluid experiments discussed in the article: http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0466 Comment on Y. Couder and E. Fort: "Single-Particle Diffraction and Interference at a Macroscopic Scale", Phys. Rev. Lett. (2006)

      svedlinView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.