HackerPapers

arXiv:1401.4356quant-ph

Why bouncing droplets are a pretty good model of quantum mechanics

Robert Brady, Ross Anderson

Abstract

In 2005, Couder, Protiere, Fort and Badouad showed that oil droplets bouncing on a vibrating tray of oil can display nonlocal interactions reminiscent of the particle-wave associations in quantum mechanics; in particular they can move, attract, repel and orbit each other. Subsequent experimental work by Couder, Fort, Protiere, Eddi, Sultan, Moukhtar, Rossi, Molacek, Bush and Sbitnev has established that bouncing drops exhibit single-slit and double-slit diffraction, tunnelling, quantised energy levels, Anderson localisation and the creation/annihilation of droplet/bubble pairs. In this paper we explain why. We show first that the surface waves guiding the droplets are Lorentz covariant with the characteristic speed c of the surface waves; second, that pairs of bouncing droplets experience an inverse-square force of attraction or repulsion according to their relative phase, and an analogue of the magnetic force; third, that bouncing droplets are governed by an analogue of Schroedinger's equation where Planck's constant is replaced by an appropriate constant of the motion; and fourth, that orbiting droplet pairs exhibit spin-half symmetry and align antisymmetrically as in the Pauli exclusion principle. Our analysis explains the similarities between bouncing-droplet experiments and the behaviour of quantum-mechanical particles. It also enables us to highlight some differences, and to predict some surprising phenomena that can be tested in feasible experiments.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics physics.flu-dynFluid Dynamics

On Hacker News

Linked by 5 identifiable commenters in 5 comments across 5 threads, from Jun 2014 to Aug 2017.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments5 threads

    • >Show me a macroscopic system that exhibits true wave-particle duality and can be used as an analogy for quantum systems, then I'll take it seriously. With the "true" in that sentence, we might be dealing with some moving goalposts, but this[0] is a well-known classical system…

      LolWolfView on HNParent context

    • Not necessarily directly correlated, but I couldn't resist posting about the Couder/Fort oil drop experiments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9yWv5dqSKk https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4356

      GregBuchholzView on HNParent context

    • See http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4356, a paper by Ross Anderson and Robert Brady. They've since expanded the theory greatly, with other papers on arxiv. Also, check out this fascinating debate about these matters on Scott Aaronson's blog. Link is…

      anoncoderView on HNParent context

  1. Is Quantum Intuition Possible? 1 comment
    • The work of Couder et al. on oil droplets might show a way for more of a "quantum intuition". It's a pity that the article does not mention this work. See eg. http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4356

      chopinView on HNParent context

    • Allow me to not agree with your classification of the top article as "garbage." I've got from it more than from the text you linked to and I'm even less satisfied with your explanations whereas Natalie Wolchover did a rather good article. Please tell me if you have any…

      acqqView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.