HackerPapers

arXiv:1402.0290math.AP

Finite time blowup for an averaged three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation

Terence Tao

Abstract

The Navier-Stokes equation on the Euclidean space $\mathbf{R}^3$ can be expressed in the form $\partial_t u = Δu + B(u,u)$, where $B$ is a certain bilinear operator on divergence-free vector fields $u$ obeying the cancellation property $\langle B(u,u), u\rangle=0$ (which is equivalent to the energy identity for the Navier-Stokes equation). In this paper, we consider a modification $\partial_t u = Δu + \tilde B(u,u)$ of this equation, where $\tilde B$ is an averaged version of the bilinear operator $B$ (where the average involves rotations and Fourier multipliers of order zero), and which also obeys the cancellation condition $\langle \tilde B(u,u), u \rangle = 0$ (so that it obeys the usual energy identity). By analysing a system of ODE related to (but more complicated than) a dyadic Navier-Stokes model of Katz and Pavlovic, we construct an example of a smooth solution to such a averaged Navier-Stokes equation which blows up in finite time. This demonstrates that any attempt to positively resolve the Navier-Stokes global regularity problem in three dimensions has to use finer structure on the nonlinear portion $B(u,u)$ of the equation than is provided by harmonic analysis estimates and the energy identity. We also propose a program for adapting these blowup results to the true Navier-Stokes equations.

arXiv comments
76 pages, nine figures, submitted. Referee suggestions and corrections implemented (in particular, the averaging is now over dilations in addition to Fourier multipliers and rotations)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.APAnalysis of PDEs

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 4 threads, from Feb 2014 to Oct 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Nov 2024 to Nov 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

    • Navier-Stokes is an equation, not a theorem, so there is no such thing as "a proof of Navier-Stokes". The equation is a partial-differential-equation model of viscous fluid flow. Its correctness has never been in doubt: we know it cannot possibly be an exact description of real…

      kragenView on HNParent context

    • It seems relevant that Terence Tao is the author of the paper that just about convinced everyone that the Navier-Stokes equations blow up in finite time, 12 years ago: http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0290

      kragenView on HNParent context

    • I won't hold my breath until this has been sufficiently reviewed by mathematicians, especially Terence Tao, since he has also work done work in this area: http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0290 .

      FreeFullView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.