https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.0290/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000036urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.0290:50000036Wed, 07 Oct 2026 23:13:53 GMT<p>Navier-Stokes is an equation, not a theorem, so there is no such thing as &quot;a proof of Navier-Stokes&quot;. The equation is a partial-differential-equation model of viscous fluid flow. Its correctness has never been in doubt: we know it cannot possibly be an exact description of real fluid flow, that it&#x27;s a pretty good approximate description, and that there exist well-behaved solutions for a number of initial conditions. What OpenAI purports to have proven, as I understand it, is that certain initial conditions to that equation, plus &quot;forcing&quot; over time (which could be a literal force acting on…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.0290/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.APhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49621162urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.0290:49621162Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:51:18 GMT<p>It seems relevant that Terence Tao is the author of the paper that just about convinced everyone that the Navier-Stokes equations blow up in finite time, 12 years ago: http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0290</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.0290/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.APhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42109388urn:hackerpapers:submission:1402.0290:42109388Mon, 11 Nov 2024 18:37:38 GMT<p>Finite time blowup for averaged three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation (2015)</p><p></p><p>1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.0290/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>math.APhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11465718urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.0290:11465718Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:01:52 GMT<p>I won&#x27;t hold my breath until this has been sufficiently reviewed by mathematicians, especially Terence Tao, since he has also work done work in this area: http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0290 .</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.0290/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.APhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7292197urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.0290:7292197Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:52:31 GMT<p>Here is the paper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.0290v2.pdf</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.0290/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.AP