HackerPapers

arXiv:1301.0219physics.hist-ph

What's in a Name: History and Meanings of the Term "Big Bang"

Helge Kragh

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The name "big bang" introduced by Fred Hoyle in 1949 is one of the most successful scientific neologisms ever. How did the name originate and how was it received by physicists and astronomers in the period leading up to the hot big bang consensus model in the late 1960s? How did it reflect the meanings of the big bang, a concept that predates the name by nearly two decades? The paper gives a detailed account of names and concepts associated with finite-age cosmological models from the 1920s to the 1970s. It turns out that Hoyle's celebrated name has a richer and more surprising history than commonly assumed and also that the literature on modern cosmology and its history includes many common mistakes and errors. By following the story of "big bang" a new dimension is added to the historical understanding of the emergence of modern cosmology.

arXiv comments
47 pages; 6 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
physics.hist-phHistory and Philosophy of Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2016 to May 2016.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The cosmological Lemaître- Eddington model later became knick named "big bang" by Frederick Hoyle later, who apparently was reluctant to "believe" that the universe had a beginning point. It's commonly speculated that many of the physics community at that time disliked the idea…

      elcritchView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.