<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What's in a Name: History and Meanings of the Term "Big Bang" · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.0219/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.0219/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>What's in a Name: History and Meanings of the Term "Big Bang" — mentioned by elcritch</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11645660</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1301.0219:11645660</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 18:15:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The cosmological Lemaître- Eddington model later became knick named &amp;quot;big bang&amp;quot; by Frederick Hoyle later, who apparently was reluctant to &amp;quot;believe&amp;quot; that the universe had a beginning point. It&amp;#x27;s commonly speculated that many of the physics community at that time disliked the idea as a statically existing universe was in vogue and that Lemaître was a Catholic priest caused Hoyle and others to deride the model as a &amp;quot;big bang&amp;quot; (with an underlying assumption that Lemaître assumed that God was the originator of why the expansion happened, see [1] pg 6). It&amp;#x27;s a bit unclear as to the exact thoughts of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1301.0219/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.hist-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
