HackerPapers

arXiv:1201.4407quant-ph

Memory Attacks on Device-Independent Quantum Cryptography

Jonathan Barrett, Roger Colbeck, Adrian Kent

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Device-independent quantum cryptographic schemes aim to guarantee security to users based only on the output statistics of any components used, and without the need to verify their internal functionality. Since this would protect users against untrustworthy or incompetent manufacturers, sabotage or device degradation, this idea has excited much interest, and many device-independent schemes have been proposed. Here we identify a critical weakness of device-independent protocols that rely on public communication between secure laboratories. Untrusted devices may record their inputs and outputs and reveal information about them via publicly discussed outputs during later runs. Reusing devices thus compromises the security of a protocol and risks leaking secret data. Possible defences include securely destroying or isolating used devices. However, these are costly and often impractical. We propose other more practical partial defences as well as a new protocol structure for device-independent quantum key distribution that aims to achieve composable security in the case of two parties using a small number of devices to repeatedly share keys with each another (and no other party).

arXiv comments
6+4 pages. Title updated to match published version. Expanded discussion of countermeasures. We wish to underline (in particular, for the benefit of any readers unfamiliar with the field) that our attacks apply to quantum cryptography in the scenario where the quantum devices used are completely untrusted, and not in the usual scenario in which the device manufacturers are trusted
Journal reference
Physical Review Letters 110, 010503 (2013)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010503
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2012 to Jan 2012.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Despite the fact that this same "serious flaw" exists with classical cryptography devices, only worse (since the quantum attack doesn't reveal plaintext A until B is sent). How would you do this with classical cryptography? Isn't the point about this particular flaw that it is…

      tjoffView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.