HackerPapers

arXiv:1108.4223math.LO

The set-theoretic multiverse

Joel David Hamkins

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The multiverse view in set theory, introduced and argued for in this article, is the view that there are many distinct concepts of set, each instantiated in a corresponding set-theoretic universe. The universe view, in contrast, asserts that there is an absolute background set concept, with a corresponding absolute set-theoretic universe in which every set-theoretic question has a definite answer. The multiverse position, I argue, explains our experience with the enormous diversity of set-theoretic possibilities, a phenomenon that challenges the universe view. In particular, I argue that the continuum hypothesis is settled on the multiverse view by our extensive knowledge about how it behaves in the multiverse, and as a result it can no longer be settled in the manner formerly hoped for.

arXiv comments
35 pages
Journal reference
Review of Symbolic Logic 5:416-449 (2012)
DOI
doi:10.1017/S1755020311000359
Subjects
math.LOLogic

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2025 to Jan 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Transcendental Syntax 1 comment
    • > For instance, set theory as the foundations of mathematics is a pretty solid model but it is seen as fundamentally unsatisfying for many reasons -- most famously the continuous hypothesis. To confirm, s/continuous hypothesis/continuum hypothesis/ ? Also, for the curious…

      BalinKingView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.