https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1108.4223/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42627549urn:hackerpapers:mention:1108.4223:42627549Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:12:54 GMT<p>&gt; For instance, set theory as the foundations of mathematics is a pretty solid model but it is seen as fundamentally unsatisfying for many reasons -- most famously the continuous hypothesis. To confirm, s/continuous hypothesis/continuum hypothesis/ ? Also, for the curious, here&#x27;s a paper pushing back on the idea that the continuum hypothesis et al. even &quot;need&quot; to be resolved in the first place: https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.4223 (The set-theoretic multiverse, JD Hamkins, 2011). (I don&#x27;t know anything about set theory myself, so I can&#x27;t personally comment on what it says—but AFAICT Hamkins is…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1108.4223/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.LO