HackerPapers

arXiv:1106.4481quant-ph

Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system

Radek Lapkiewicz, Peizhe Li, Christoph Schaeff, Nathan K. Langford, Sven Ramelow, Marcin Wiesniak, Anton Zeilinger

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Quantum theory demands that, in contrast to classical physics, not all properties can be simultaneously well defined. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a manifestation of this fact. Another important corollary arises that there can be no joint probability distribution describing the outcomes of all possible measurements, allowing a quantum system to be classically understood. We provide the first experimental evidence that even for a single three-state system, a qutrit, no such classical model can exist that correctly describes the results of a simple set of pairwise compatible measurements. Not only is a single qutrit the simplest system in which such a contradiction is possible, but, even more importantly, the contradiction cannot result from entanglement, because such a system is indivisible, and it does not even allow the concept of entanglement between subsystems.

arXiv comments
11 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables
Journal reference
Nature 474, 490 (2011)
DOI
doi:10.1038/nature10119
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2018 to Aug 2018.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Do electrons think? (1949) 1 comment
    • In this instance, the popular understanding corresponds to the latest research better than realist theories like pilot-wave theory. Proponents of realist interpretations of QM have relied for decades on identifying possible classical channels of relativistic communication, or…

      jmcmichaelView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.