HackerPapers

arXiv:1010.5696physics.class-ph

A blackbody is not a blackbox

Matteo Smerlak

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We discuss carefully the blackbody approximation, stressing what it is (a limit case of radiative transfer), and what it is not (the assumption that the body is perfectly absorbing, i.e. black). Furthermore, we derive the Planck spectrum without enclosing the field in a box, as is done in most textbooks. Athough convenient, this trick conceals the nature of the idealization expressed in the concept of a blackbody: first, the most obvious examples of approximate blackbodies, stars, are definitely not enclosed in boxes; second, the Planck spectrum is continuous, while the stationary modes of radiation in a box are discrete. Our derivation, although technically less elementary, is conceptually more consistent, and brings the opportunity to introduce to students the important concept of local density of states, via the resolvent formalism.

arXiv comments
6 pages
Journal reference
Eur. J. Phys. 32, 1143 (2011)
DOI
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/32/5/002
Subjects
physics.class-phClassical Physics physics.ed-phPhysics Education physics.gen-phGeneral Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2015 to May 2015.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. The Physics of a Light Bulb 1 comment
    • Adding insult to injury, that paper isn't even 100% correct, there is a subsequent comment paper pointing out the errors. Here [1] is a full-text link to a better paper explaining blackbody radiation properly. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.5696

      semi-extrinsicView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.