<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A blackbody is not a blackbox · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.5696/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.5696/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A blackbody is not a blackbox — mentioned by semi-extrinsic</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9585553</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1010.5696:9585553</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 21:43:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Adding insult to injury, that paper isn&amp;#x27;t even 100% correct, there is a subsequent comment paper pointing out the errors. Here [1] is a full-text link to a better paper explaining blackbody radiation properly. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.5696&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.5696/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.class-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
