HackerPapers

arXiv:1010.1092stat.AP

Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology

Keith A. Baggerly, Kevin R. Coombes

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

High-throughput biological assays such as microarrays let us ask very detailed questions about how diseases operate, and promise to let us personalize therapy. Data processing, however, is often not described well enough to allow for exact reproduction of the results, leading to exercises in "forensic bioinformatics" where aspects of raw data and reported results are used to infer what methods must have been employed. Unfortunately, poor documentation can shift from an inconvenience to an active danger when it obscures not just methods but errors. In this report we examine several related papers purporting to use microarray-based signatures of drug sensitivity derived from cell lines to predict patient response. Patients in clinical trials are currently being allocated to treatment arms on the basis of these results. However, we show in five case studies that the results incorporate several simple errors that may be putting patients at risk. One theme that emerges is that the most common errors are simple (e.g., row or column offsets); conversely, it is our experience that the most simple errors are common. We then discuss steps we are taking to avoid such errors in our own investigations.

arXiv comments
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS291 the Annals of Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)
Journal reference
Annals of Applied Statistics 2009, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1309-1334
DOI
doi:10.1214/09-AOAS291
Subjects
stat.APApplications (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jul 2011 to Jul 2011.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • To provide additional context (the NYT article is fine, but doesn't give a sense of the technical issues with the study, or of how difficult/impossible it was to bring attention to those issues; the behavior of Duke seems particularly scandalous)... If you have a few minutes…

      anotherView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.