<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.1092/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.1092/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology — mentioned by another</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2743198</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1010.1092:2743198</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:56:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;To provide additional context (the NYT article is fine, but doesn&amp;#x27;t give a sense of the technical issues with the study, or of how difficult/impossible it was to bring attention to those issues; the behavior of Duke seems particularly scandalous)... If you have a few minutes, Baggerly&amp;#x27;s talk---on the &amp;quot;forensic bioinformatics&amp;quot; undertaken to pinpoint the study&amp;#x27;s flaws---is fascinating: http://videolectures.net/cancerbioinformatics2010_baggerly_i... The associated paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1092 Recent small steps toward preventing similar problems in the future…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1010.1092/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
