arXiv:1006.4848hep-ph
Power Spectrum Analysis of BNL Decay-Rate Data
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Evidence for an anomalous annual periodicity in certain nuclear decay data has led to speculation concerning a possible solar influence on nuclear processes. As a test of this hypothesis, we here search for evidence in decay data that might be indicative of a process involving solar rotation, focusing on data for 32Si and 36Cl decay rates acquired at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. Examination of the power spectrum over a range of frequencies (10 - 15 year^-1) appropriate for solar synodic rotation rates reveals several periodicities, the most prominent being one at 11.18 year^-1 with power 20.76. We evaluate the significance of this peak in terms of the false-alarm probability, by means of the shuffle test, and also by means of a new test (the "shake" test) that involves small random time displacements. The last two tests indicate that the peak at 11.18 year^-1 would arise by chance only once out of about 10^7 trials. Since there are several peaks in the search band, we also investigate the running mean of the power spectrum, and identify a major peak at 11.93 year^-1 with peak running-mean power 4.08. Application of the shuffle test and the shake test indicates that there is less than one chance in 10^11, and one chance in 10^15, respectively, finding by chance a value as large as 4.08.
Actually the paper discussed in OP is a preprint at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4848 It uses an extremely suspicious technique to test the significance of their finding. I doubt this paper will pass review without substantial changes. edit: The one you posted is 2 years old, but…
matthewwView on HNParent context