<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Power Spectrum Analysis of BNL Decay-Rate Data · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1006.4848/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1006.4848/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Power Spectrum Analysis of BNL Decay-Rate Data — mentioned by mattheww</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1630390</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1006.4848:1630390</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:10:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually the paper discussed in OP is a preprint at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4848 It uses an extremely suspicious technique to test the significance of their finding. I doubt this paper will pass review without substantial changes. edit: The one you posted is 2 years old, but tries to explain the same effect with a different cause.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1006.4848/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
