arXiv:0811.1855physics.ao-ph
Are there basic physical constraints on future anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide?
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Global Climate Models (GCMs) provide forecasts of future climate warming using a wide variety of highly sophisticated anthropogenic CO2 emissions models as input, each based on the evolution of four emissions "drivers": population p, standard of living g, energy productivity (or efficiency) f and energy carbonization c. The range of scenarios considered is extremely broad, however, and this is a primary source of forecast uncertainty. Here, it is shown both theoretically and observationally how the evolution of the human system can be considered from a surprisingly simple thermodynamic perspective in which it is unnecessary to explicitly model two of the emissions drivers: population and standard of living. Specifically, the human system grows through a self-perpetuating feedback loop in which the consumption rate of primary energy resources stays tied to the historical accumulation of global economic production - or p times g - through a time-independent factor of 9.7 +/- 0.3 milliwatts per inflation-adjusted 1990 US dollar. This important constraint, and the fact that f and c have historically varied rather slowly, points towards substantially narrowed visions of future emissions scenarios for implementation in GCMs.
Yes, and this is why the living standard is falling. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.1855
BeijingerView on HNParent context
"It comes from an idea that economic progress is coupled with increased energy use" Yest it is. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.1855 "a fallacy that hasn't been true for decades" Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox Same with AI. It is becoming much more efficient and…
BeijingerView on HNParent context