<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are there basic physical constraints on future anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0811.1855/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0811.1855/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are there basic physical constraints on future anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide? — mentioned by Beijinger</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50081319</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0811.1855:50081319</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:34:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It comes from an idea that economic progress is coupled with increased energy use&amp;quot; Yest it is. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.1855 &amp;quot;a fallacy that hasn&amp;#x27;t been true for decades&amp;quot; Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox Same with AI. It is becoming much more efficient and cheaper. This will result in a much, much higher demand. Expect Netflix to render a movie based on your wishes in real time. That the energy demand is sinking is based on the fact that most industries got outsourced to China.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0811.1855/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ao-ph</category></item><item><title>Are there basic physical constraints on future anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide? — mentioned by Beijinger</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50081248</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0811.1855:50081248</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:24:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, and this is why the living standard is falling. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.1855&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0811.1855/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ao-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
