HackerPapers

arXiv:0807.3930quant-ph

No Evidence for Particles

Casey Blood

Abstract

There are a number of experiments and observations that appear to argue for the existence of particles, including the photoelectric and Compton effects, exposure of only one film grain by a spread-out photon wave function, and particle-like trajectories in bubble chambers. It can be shown, however, that all the particle-like phenomena can be explained by using properties of the wave functions/state vectors alone. Thus there is no evidence for particles. Wave-particle duality arises because the wave functions alone have both wave-like and particle-like properties. Further the results of the Bell-Aspect experiment and other experiments on entangled systems, which seem to imply peculiar properties for particles if they exist, are easily and naturally understood if reality consists of the state vectors alone. The linear equation-Hilbert space structure for the state vectors, by itself, can explain every mystery in quantum mechanics except the origin of the probability law.

arXiv comments
Version 2, April, 2011, 16 pages. All the arguments are redone, particularly the derivation of the perception of a single, classical version of reality. Includes the relation of this method to decoherence
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jan 2016 to Feb 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • It's still called a particle because that's a useful abstraction, and also keep in mind that correctly identifying it as resonance happened much later than people first started to use said abstraction. In reality, we know by now that there's no such thing as a particle…

      p_noumenonView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.