No Evidence for Particles — mentioned by p_noumenon

Fri, 04 Feb 2022 22:33:13 GMT

It's still called a particle because that's a useful abstraction, and also keep in mind that correctly identifying it as resonance happened much later than people first started to use said abstraction. In reality, we know by now that there's no such thing as a particle: https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3930

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

No Evidence for Particles — mentioned by klank

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:11:06 GMT

Angular momentum could be encoded in the wave function. http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3930

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

No Evidence for Particles · HackerPapers discussions

No Evidence for Particles — mentioned by p_noumenon

No Evidence for Particles — mentioned by klank