arXiv:0706.3639cs.AI
This paper is a survey of a large number of informal definitions of ``intelligence'' that the authors have collected over the years. Naturally, compiling a complete list would be impossible as many definitions of intelligence are buried deep inside articles and books. Nevertheless, the 70-odd definitions presented here are, to the authors' knowledge, the largest and most well referenced collection there is.
Linked by 6 identifiable commenters in 7 comments across 6 threads, from Mar 2016 to Oct 2025. Found in 3 HN submissions from Jul 2016 to Jul 2026. Open submission discussions.
First, "artificial intelligence" is the name of the field of study that tries to build systems that act intelligently, not a term for referring to the produced systems. Even if some outcome isn't (or wasn't) yet particularly intelligent, the name of the field is entirely…
I think the Legg&Hutter definition "Intelligence measures an agent’s ability to achieve goals in a wide range of environments" [1] is quite relevant for this issue - once we consider not a technique for a specific task, but a single system adapted for a variety of tasks and…
> It is a term gaining in popularity due to this difficult to define definition and allows for more a porn like definition > Philosophers, psychologists, neuroscientists, and many others have been contemplating the definition of intelligence for centuries and we're still not…
FYI, there are a ton of definitions of 'intelligence', some fit with what AI algorithms can do, some don't. I found reading 'A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence' quite interesting myself https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3639
Shane Legg (a DeepMind founder) and Marcus Hutter collected and categorized 70 different definitions of intelligence: http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3639 Their attempt at a definition that synthesizes all the others is: > Intelligence measures an agent's ability to achieve goals in a…
Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.
stop repeating that. first, it isn't true that intelligence is barely defined. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3639 second a definition is obviously not a prerequisite as evidenced by natural selection
nh23423fefeView on HNParent context
> stop repeating that. first, it isn't true that intelligence is barely defined. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3639 I don't think he should stop, because I think he's right. We lack a definition of intelligence that doesn't do a lot of hand waving. You linked to a paper with 18…
thomasdziedzicView on HNParent context