<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Begging the Signalling Question: Quantum Signalling and the Dynamics of Multiparticle Systems · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9906036/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9906036/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Begging the Signalling Question: Quantum Signalling and the Dynamics of Multiparticle Systems — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42256656</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:quant-ph_9906036:42256656</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:08:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Begging the Signalling Question (1999)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9906036/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Begging the Signalling Question: Quantum Signalling and the Dynamics of Multiparticle Systems — mentioned by meltyness</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34270108</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9906036:34270108</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 02:17:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s a fantastic and memorable article about this. Thankfully it is the first result on Scholar for &amp;quot;Mulder scully quantum&amp;quot;[0]. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9906036&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9906036/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Begging the Signalling Question: Quantum Signalling and the Dynamics of Multiparticle Systems — mentioned by Kell</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7030528</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9906036:7030528</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:12:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hahahaha. You&amp;#x27;re funny. Ok. So I&amp;#x27;m doing a strawman... But you&amp;#x27;re not doing an argument from authority ? So let&amp;#x27;s be clear. Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem is not an &amp;quot;old thing&amp;quot;. I mean, what serious scientist argue something like that... (Yep, that&amp;#x27;s a No true Scotsman ;-) ) I&amp;#x27;ve never encountered any argument in that direction. Of course some people argue against some of the derivations of Bell&amp;#x27;s theorem, and his test, but against the soundness of the theorem in itself ? For the record : &amp;quot;No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics.&amp;quot; Then…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9906036/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
