<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Grover's quantum searching algorithm is optimal · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9711070/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9711070/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Grover's quantum searching algorithm is optimal — mentioned by Strilanc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46384911</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9711070:46384911</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 15:21:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, speed matters. No, quantum computers can&amp;#x27;t do everything instantly even with unbounded qubits. A well studied example is that it&amp;#x27;s impossible to parallelize the steps in Grover&amp;#x27;s algorithm. To find a preimage amongst N possibilities, with only black box access, you need Ω(sqrt(N)) sequential steps on the quantum computer [1]. Another well known case is that there&amp;#x27;s no known way to execute a fault tolerant quantum circuit faster than its reaction depth (other than finding a rewrite that reduces the depth, such as replacing a ripple carry adder with a carry lookahead adder) [2]. There&amp;#x27;s no…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9711070/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
