The Logic of Quantum Mechanics Derived from Classical General Relativity — mentioned by naasking

Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:15:25 GMT

They might be novel mathematical constructs but seemingly have no bearing on our universe. ER=EPR doesn't really solve anything because GR remains fundamentally incompatible with QM's linearity. That's the problem that needs to be solved. The core idea of ER=EPR wasn't even particularly novel, as Hadley effectively did something very similar back in 1997 [1]. CA-duality is again mathematically interesting, but physically dubious because it's based on anti-de Sitter space, which does not describe our universe. Information theoretical formulations of QM are mildly interesting, but I don't think…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The Logic of Quantum Mechanics Derived from Classical General Relativity — mentioned by naasking

Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:15:13 GMT

I think that's more or less correct. GR suggests "time" isn't independent, we instead have 4-dimensional "spacetime". The idea that future inputs can influence past configurations can be perfectly sensible in this context. It's like a restricted form of consistent closed timelike curves. There was some development in this direction years ago: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics Derived from Classical General Relativity, https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9706018

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The Logic of Quantum Mechanics Derived from Classical General Relativity · HackerPapers discussions

The Logic of Quantum Mechanics Derived from Classical General Relativity — mentioned by naasking

The Logic of Quantum Mechanics Derived from Classical General Relativity — mentioned by naasking