<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Chaotic Ball: An Intuitive Analogy for EPR Experiments · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9611037/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9611037/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Chaotic Ball: An Intuitive Analogy for EPR Experiments — mentioned by flubert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27896707</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9611037:27896707</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:36:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This is the first of a set of papers that look at actual Einstein-Podolksy-Rosen (EPR) experiments from the point of view of a scientifically and statistically literate person who is not a specialist in quantum theory.&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9611037 ...I wonder if anyone has ever followed up on Caroline Thompson&amp;#x27;s work after she passed away. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210150&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9611037/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The Chaotic Ball: An Intuitive Analogy for EPR Experiments — mentioned by flubert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25653348</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9611037:25653348</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:33:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;I think many comments here miss the point. Is there an area of study that looks at how people discuss things? Including, but not limited to misunderstanding/miscommunication dealing with things analogies, thought experiments, and the like? So that you could make predictions. For example, since &amp;quot;story A&amp;quot; used analogies &amp;quot;B and C&amp;quot;, then we&amp;#x27;d expect ~50% of the commentators on said article will fixate on B, since that is their favorite topic, and they never tire of discussing B, even if it is purely incidental the point of the article. So you could potentially tailor your article help minimize…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9611037/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The Chaotic Ball: An Intuitive Analogy for EPR Experiments — mentioned by flubert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24767455</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9611037:24767455</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:01:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone know if anyone has followed up on Caroline Thompson&amp;#x27;s work after she passed away? &amp;quot;The Chaotic Ball: An Intuitive Analogy for EPR Experiments&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9611037&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9611037/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
