<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Negative entropy in quantum information theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9610005/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9610005/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Negative entropy in quantum information theory — mentioned by amoruso</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14710895</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9610005:14710895</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 14:59:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;John Cramer has been pointing this out for years (since the 1980s I think): &amp;quot;The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Nonlocality&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00039 Also, Bell&amp;#x27;s inequality shows the state vector is nonlocal, and and that implies causality violation in relativity. Third, quantum information theory has retrocausality in the form of negative entropy: &amp;quot;Negative entropy in quantum information theory&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9610005 Too many things pointing in the same direction. This is the right way to look at it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9610005/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Negative entropy in quantum information theory — mentioned by carlob</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7602316</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9610005:7602316</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:04:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Without reading the paper or watching the video. &amp;gt; 1) What does it mean that entangled particles are supercorrelated? How can S(A|B) = 2 or -1? The density matrix does not have the same properties of a joint probability distribution, so quantum entropy doesn&amp;#x27;t really have the same properties of classical entropy. [1] &amp;gt; 2) The formula for Von Neumann entropy is S = -Tr(p log(p)), where p is the density matrix. How do you take a log of a matrix? The log of a matrix is defined as the inverse of the matrix exponential. The matrix exponential can be defined as the usual power series, only using…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9610005/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
