<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nonlocal and local ghost fields in quantum correlations. · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9502017/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9502017/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Nonlocal and local ghost fields in quantum correlations. — mentioned by farrelle25</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46031250</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:quant-ph_9502017:46031250</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:19:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Another interpretation of the double-slit posits a guiding &amp;#x27;Pilot Wave&amp;#x27; separate from physical particles... aka DeBroglie-Bohm Theory or Bohmian Mechanics. Apparently it&amp;#x27;s not popular among professional physicsts though John Bell investigated it a bit. Einstein had some unpublished notes in the 1920s about a &amp;quot;Gespensterfeld&amp;quot; (ghost field) that guided particles. Born was influenced by this &amp;#x27;Ghost field&amp;#x27; idea when he published his famous interpretation of the &amp;#x27;Wave Function&amp;#x27; |Ψ|^2 as a probability rather than a physical field. More info: Nonlocal and local ghost fields in quantum correlations.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/quant-ph_9502017/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
